【130228】❤EFY❤【阅读阅开心】No.118

发表于:2013-02-27 22:00 [只看楼主] [划词开启]

 

(左键刷蓝不会的单词-点击查词-即见单词的音标释义,回复者体会者另外奖励150沪元)

点击查看大图 亲们,轩尘终于回到学校了,相信大家也应该回到学校了吧?终于开始正式的学习啦,在家真的效率有点低。希望振奋起来!!

          

     One of the most interesting paradoxes in America today is that Harvard University, the oldest institution of higher learning in the United States, is now engaged in a serious debate about what a university should be, and whether it is measuring up.   

      Like the Roman Catholic Church and other ancient institutions, it is asking - still in private rather than in public - whether its past assumptions about faculty, authority, admissions, courses of study, are really relevant to the problems of the 1990’s.   

      『Should Harvard or any other university be an intellectual sanctuary, apart from the political and social revolution of the age, or should it be a laboratory for experimentation with these political and social revolutions; or even an engine of the revolution? 』①This is what is being discussed privately in the big clapboard houses of faculty members around the Harvard Yard.    
      The issue was defined by Waiter Lippmann, a distinguished Harvard graduate, several years ago. “If the universities are to do their work,” he said, “they must be independent and they must be disinterested… They are places to which men can turn for judgements which are unbiased by partisanship and special interest. 『Obviously, the moment the universities fall under political control, or under the control of private interests, or the moment they themselves take a hand in politics and the leadership of government, their value as independent and disinterested sources of judgement is impaired.”』②   

      This is part of the argument that is going on at Harvard today. Another part is the argument of the militant and even many moderate students: that a university is the keeper of our ideals and morals, and should not be “disinterested” but activist in bringing the nation’s ideals and actions together.   

      Harvard’s men of today seem more troubled and less sure about personal, political and academic purpose than they did at the beginning. 『They are not even clear about how they should debate and resolve their problems, but they are struggling with them privately, and how they come out is bound to influence American university and political life in the1990’s.』.


点击查看大图

点击查看大图OK,文章的大概意思都看懂了么?下面让我们做两道题来试试吧~

 

 

~O(_)O~, 订阅节目戳这里哦~~~[imgurl=http://bulo.hujiang.com/menu/subscribe.aspx?id=4303]http://bulo.hujiang.com/menu/images/sub_4.gif[/img]

 

PS.往期节目还没做的亲,点我进入节目单,奖励照发哦~~~\(≧▽≦)/~~~

 

答题区

1、The issues in the debate on Harvard’s goals are whether the universities should remain independent of our society and its problems, and whether they should .
2、The word “paradox” in paragraph 1 is ?
最后编辑于:2013-03-03 10:47

本帖来源社刊

全部回复 (24) 回复 反向排序

  • 0

    点赞

  • 收藏

  • 扫一扫分享朋友圈

    二维码

  • 分享

课程推荐

需要先加入社团哦

编辑标签

最多可添加10个标签,不同标签用英文逗号分开

保存

编辑官方标签

最多可添加10个官方标签,不同标签用英文逗号分开

保存
知道了

复制到我的社团